Why AI can’t spot great camp leaders


A typical camp director job posting can get over 100 applications.

Most recruiting firms feed those resumes through keyword scanners and AI filters, then hand over a stack of “qualified” candidates.

But do those firms and algorithms understand camp culture?

Are they seeing the subtle clues that separate real camp leaders from those just looking for any nonprofit job?

Reading Between the Resume Lines

Everyone says their industry is unique. Most industries aren’t. Camp actually is.

Camp leadership doesn’t always translate 1:1 to standard resume formats.

Someone might describe working with families during a crisis as “customer service excellence.”

They could have deliberately built their career at smaller organizations instead of chasing promotions, which actually makes them an awesome culture fit.

The reverse happens too. A resume lists “youth programming” experience, but maybe the person only managed budgets or wrote reports, rarely seeing how a large group game should run.

This pattern recognition comes from understanding camp culture, not keyword matching.

You need human judgment to spot the difference between someone who gets camp and someone who thinks it might be a fun career change.

The Filtering Process

Step 1 was critical in understanding the camp, the history, the stakeholders, the team, the place.

Step 2 is about understanding the people who would make for great matches.

We grade each resume against the specific rubric we created in Step 1.

With skills like leadership experience, community engagement, camp management skills, and staff development, each area gets scored based on what your organization actually needs.

They might have impressive corporate credentials, but zero experience with the daily reality of camp operations.

Others look great on paper, but their knowledge of the camp's local community makes no sense for a day camp role.

For overnight camps, you might find someone with perfect credentials who’s never lived on-site anywhere.

They might not understand that camp directing means your office, home, and community are all the same place.

The Human Advantage

Automated systems look for keywords like “leadership” and “youth development.”

But can they evaluate whether someone’s leadership style fits your camp’s culture?

Do they understand that fundraising experience matters differently for nonprofit camps versus for-profit ones?

And maybe most importantly, they can read the lines but can’t read between them.

When someone describes their camp experience in basic terms but you can tell they actually understand the rhythm of camp life.

That’s human judgment, not algorithm detection.

This is Step 2 of our four-step approach. The result?

You only spend time with people who could actually succeed at your camp.

Algorithms and big hiring firms are great for many things.

Understanding whether someone can connect with eight-year-olds while managing anxious parents and inspiring teenage staff? That takes people who get it. Who’ve been there. Who know camp.

Some things in camp leadership can’t be automated.

Finding the right people is one of them.

Sincerely,
Dan Weir

Senior Consultant at Immersive1st

dan@immersive1st.com

Featured Open Position

Senior Director of Camps - JCC Abrams Camps

Location: East Windsor, NJ

Salary Range: $75k-$85k

Description: Lead a premier Jewish day camp by guiding staff, programs, and community engagement to create joyful and transformative experiences for campers.

📈

How does Immersive1st recruit talent →

🎨

Meet the people behind Immersive1st

Learn more about Immersive1st's Approach

video preview

Share this email with a colleague!

Looking for jobs in summer camps and nonprofits? Subscribe for new openings and job search tips.

Hiring? The next issue will show how your organization can reach the right candidates.

Immersive1st

Subscribe to the Immersive1st newsletter for new openings and smart job search tips. Hiring? The next issue will show how your organization can reach the right candidates.

Read more from Immersive1st

Sounds obvious, right? I shouldn’t even have to say this. But so many camps struggle to answer this clearly. They know what activities they offer. They know their schedule. They can tell parents about facilities and staff ratios. Ask them “Who are you? What makes you different?” and the answer gets fuzzy. Clear identity means campers want to come back summer after summer. The Retention Paradox A summer camp approached us with a puzzle. Program quality was extraordinary. Survey results showed...

“I never got any feedback.” When listening to or surveying camp staff after a summer, this is the phrase that comes up over and over. When asked what was missing from their experience, what I most commonly hear is… Not, “The pay was too low.” Not, “The hours were brutal.” Not, “The kids were tough.” Nope. No much of that. It is this: “I never got any feedback.” The numbers back up this sentiment. 80% of employees who quit a gig cite their direct supervisor as the reason. Meanwhile, that...

Some of the best camp directors I know aren’t parents themselves. And even without little (or big) ones running around at home, they’re also exceptional at building deep, trusting relationships with families. Because the question isn’t whether a camp pro has kids of their own. The question is whether they genuinely care about the parents who trust them with theirs. Follow that? Boards and owners who are evaluating leadership candidates have to know the distinction is critical. Understanding...