Subscribe to the Immersive1st newsletter for new openings and smart job search tips. Hiring? The next issue will show how your organization can reach the right candidates.
Summer camps are competing with a $40 billion industry
|
Camps are competing with a $40 billion industry. Not other camps. Not enrichment programs. Not Disney World. Youth travel and competitive sports. This number keeps growing. The infrastructure keeps expanding. And parents keep choosing sports over summer camp, often spending three to five times as much. The irony? Parents are choosing sports for exactly the things camps do better. What Parents Say They WantWe survey families year in and year out about what they look for in their kids’ activities. In our most recent survey, 72% of affluent families have their children in travel or competitive sports. The top answers of why parents are choosing sports are that they feel these needs are being met:
But camps train staff specifically on social interaction. Camps build skill progression into curriculum. Camps provide healthier group environments and more holistic development than most sports programs. When it comes to what parents actually want, camps are the shining star. Why Sports Win AnywaySports have structural advantages that camps don’t. They operate year-round and locally. Kids see the same friends constantly. Parents form tight social communities. I know this one personally. When one of my daughters stopped playing softball, we felt it. I heard from other parents all the time some version of, “Come back! We miss you!” Plus, there’s a fear of falling behind if kids take a summer off. The pressure is intense because everyone believes their child is on a path to something great. And the community is powerful. Parents stay with sports because all the other parents are doing it. Their identity becomes tied to team membership. Even when sports are financially and emotionally draining, the social pressure keeps them in foldout chairs on the sidelines. How Camps Can CompeteThis isn’t about replacing sports. Most families won’t leave travel teams for camp. It’s about positioning camp as “yes, and.” Yes, keep playing sports. But know that camps provide all kinds of things organized sports often don't: Skill development through progression → Not just repetition, but intentional curriculum that builds over time. Social interaction without performance pressure → Connection and identity formation in environments designed for growth, not competition. Healthier routines → Outdoors, movement, sunlight, hydration, and three meals a day (which is a key distinction) There are plenty more, obviously, and it’s important for camps to know their own list. The Communication OpportunityCamps can’t out-spend a $40 billion industry. They can’t operate year-round in every local community. But camps can communicate their unique value clearly. When camp messaging emphasizes skill progression, social growth, and developmental outcomes (the exact things parents say they want btw) they become complementary to sports, not competitive with them. This means talking about: How camp staff are trained in facilitating social interaction. How skill-building happens through intentional curriculum design. How communication keeps families connected to their child’s experience. These aren’t abstract benefits. They’re the specific things parents told us they wish sports programs did better. The Positioning ShiftThe camps winning this competition aren’t trying to replace sports programs. They’re helping parents see what camp uniquely provides by making the case that kids need both. Get the structure and community of sports, sure, but also add on the holistic development and social growth of camp. When camps position themselves as “yes, and” instead of “either/or,” families start to stop seeing it as a choice. It’s more about complementary experiences that serve different developmental needs. The Bottom LineLook, travel sports aren’t going away. Quite the opposite, really. The industry is only getting bigger and more organized. But camps have something sports programs struggle to replicate: Intentional development of the whole child, delivered by trained staff, in environments designed specifically for growth. The question isn’t whether camps can compete with a $40 billion industry. It’s whether camps can communicate their value clearly enough that parents choose both. Sincerely, Senior Consultant at Immersive1st Learn more about Immersive1st's Approach |
Immersive1st
Subscribe to the Immersive1st newsletter for new openings and smart job search tips. Hiring? The next issue will show how your organization can reach the right candidates.
Is your camp safe? Camp directors, owners, and boards know exactly what I’m talking about here. Of course, I’m not asking expressly. This is probably one of the number one questions parents are asking when considering a camp. And they are right to ask. Surveying and talking to families, safety concerns were the #1 factor in choosing overnight camps. #2 for day camps right after location. Safety outpaces activities, program quality, reputation, and affordability. This was staggering. But...
Sounds obvious, right? I shouldn’t even have to say this. But so many camps struggle to answer this clearly. They know what activities they offer. They know their schedule. They can tell parents about facilities and staff ratios. Ask them “Who are you? What makes you different?” and the answer gets fuzzy. Clear identity means campers want to come back summer after summer. The Retention Paradox A summer camp approached us with a puzzle. Program quality was extraordinary. Survey results showed...
“I never got any feedback.” When listening to or surveying camp staff after a summer, this is the phrase that comes up over and over. When asked what was missing from their experience, what I most commonly hear is… Not, “The pay was too low.” Not, “The hours were brutal.” Not, “The kids were tough.” Nope. No much of that. It is this: “I never got any feedback.” The numbers back up this sentiment. 80% of employees who quit a gig cite their direct supervisor as the reason. Meanwhile, that...